Journal of Theoretical
and Applied Mechanics

56, 4, pp. 1139-1151, Warsaw 2018
DOI: 10.15632/jtam-pl.56.4.1139

Structural response of multilayered aluminum and steel specimens subjected to high strain rate loading conditions

Danish Iqbal, Vikrant Tiwari
Series of experiments and a detailed computational analysis has been performed to investi-
gate the high strain rate behaviour of homostacked Al 6063-T6 and IS 1570 alloys. Split
Hopkinson pressure bar technique was utilized to study the effect of high rate loading on the
stress strain relationship of single, double, tri and quad layered/stacked specimens. Three
different specimen aspect ratios 1, 0.75 and 0.5 were also evaluated for different strain rates.
A 2mm thick pulse shaper was employed in achieving dynamic stress equilibrium, a near
constant strain rate and a high rise time as per requirements. After analyzing the results
from the experiments it was observed that single and halved specimens showed a close match
in both the elastic and plastic regions for aluminium alloy as well as for steel. In the case of
Al 6063-T6, a nearly bi-linear nature of the constitutive curve was observed for single and
halved specimens, which transformed into near tri-linear nature for tri and quad stacked
specimens. The dynamic numerical analysis showed a good agreement between the nume-
rical and experimental results for a single and halved specimen in the case of Al alloy. For
steel, a close correlation was observed for all the four cases.
Keywords: dynamic stress strain behaviour, multilayering, pulse shaper, finite element simu- lation

References


Corran R.S.J., Shadbolt P.J., Ruiz C., 1983, Impact loading of platesan experimental inve-

stigation, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1, 1, 3-22

Ellwood S., Griffiths L.J., Parry D.J., 1982, Materials testing at high constant strain rates,

Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 15, 280-282

Engineers and Builders, 2015, Standard tools and techniques for dynamic characterization of ma-

terials, Design book, http://www.engineersandbuilders.com

Flores-Johnson E.A., Saleh M., Edwards L., 2011, Ballistic performance of multi-layered

metallic plates impacted by a 7.62-mm APM2 projectile, International Journal of Impact En-

gineering, 38, 12, 1022-1032

Hartley R.S., Cloete T.J., Nurick G.N., 2007, An experimental assessment of friction effects

in the split Hopkinson pressure bar using the ring compression test, International Journal of Impact

Engineering, 34, 1705-1728

Jankowiak T., Rusinek A., Lodygowski T., 2011, Validation of the Klepaczko-Malinowskimo-

del for friction correction and recommendations on Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar, Finite Elements

in Analysis and Design, 47, 10, 1191-1208

Jenq S.T., Sheu S.L., 1994, An experimental and numerical analysis for high strain rate com-

pressional behaviour of 6061-O aluminium alloy, Computers and Structures, 52, 1, 27-34

Johnson G.R., Cook W.H., 1983, A constitutive model and data for metal subjected to lar-

ge strains, high strain rates and high temperatures, Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on

Ballistics, The Hague, Netherlands

Khan A.S., Huang S., 1992, Experimental and theoretical study of mechanical behaviour of 1100

aluminium in the strain rate range 10āˆ’5-104 sāˆ’1, International Journal of Plasticity, 8, 4, 397-424

Kolsky H., 1949, An investigation of mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of

loading, Proceedings of the Physical Society, B, 62, 11, 676-700

Li P., Siviour C.R., Petrinic N., 2009, The effect of strain rate, specimen geometry and

lubrication on responses of aluminium AA2024 in uniaxial compression experiments, Experimental

Mechanics, 49, 4, 587-593

Naghdabadi R., Ashrafi M.J., Arghavani J., 2012, Experimental and numerical investigation

of pulse shaped split Hopkinson pressure bar test, Materials Science and Engineering A, 539, 285-293

Nia A.A., Hoseini G.R., 2011, Experimental study of perforation of multi-layered targets by

hemispherical-nosed projectiles, Materials and Design, 32, 2, 1057-1065

Pankow M., Attard C., Waas A.M., 2009, Specimen size and shape effect in split Hopkinson

pressure bar testing, Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 44, 8, 689-698

Radin J., Goldsmith W., 1988, Normal projectile penetration and perforation of layered targets,

International Journal of Impact Engineering, 7, 2, 229-259

Sato Y.S., Kokawa H., Enomoto M., Jogan S., 1999, Microstructural evolution of 6063

aluminum during friction-stir welding, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 30, 9, 2429-2437

Walley S.M., Radford D.D., Chapman D.J., 2006, The effect of aspect ratio on the compres-

sive high rate deformation of three metallic alloys, Journal de Physique IV, 134, 851-856

Woldesenbet E., Vinson J.R., 1999, Specimen geometry effects on high strain rate testing of

graphite/epoxy composites, AIAA Journal, 37, 9, 1102-1106

Wu X.J., Gorham D.A., 1997, Stress equilibrium in the split Hopkinson pressure bar test, Journal

de Physique IV, 7, C3, 91-96

Ye T., Li L., Guo P., Xiao G., Chen Z., 2016, Effect of aging treatment on the microstructure

and flow behavior of 6063 aluminum alloy compressed over a wide range of strain rate, International

Journal of Impact Engineering, 90, 72-80

Zhong W.Z., Rusinek A., Jankowiak T., Abed F., Bernier R., Sutter G., 2015, Influence

of interfacial friction and specimen configuration in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar system, Tribology

International, 90, 1-14